“90 Day Fiancé: Gino Speaks Out After Jasmine’s Divorce Claims!” || 90 Day Fiancé
In the arena where romance is broadcasted, arguments are edited into cliffhangers, and every whisper of scandal lands with the weight of a headline, Gino Palatondro (Palat Solo) emerges to answer a storm. The rumors have swelled into a tidal wave—divorce petitions, open marriages, and accusations that cut through the veneer of a fairytale reality. Jasmine Peneda, a name woven into the fabric of 90 Day Fiancé lore, has claimed a divorce, and the internet has roared with speculation about who touched the fuse that could blow up this long-running narrative. Now, as cameras hover and fans lean in, Gino’s voice—measured, deliberate, careful—steps onto the stage to dispute, clarify, and perhaps reset the terms of the story.
The tale begins with a factual tumble: Jasmine, 39, filing for divorce, a move she announced in the public square of Florida’s Legacetta newspaper—a quiet, legal signal that a personal war might be waged in the open arena of paperwork and court dates. The twist is in the method: Jasmine says she couldn’t serve Gino, 56, at his Michigan home, and thus chose a formal route to ensure the papers would arrive somewhere, somehow, someday. TMZ cites this as the spark, the moment the social world lit up with “what happened next?” questions, the kind that keep viewers refreshing feeds and rewatching old episodes for clues.
Gino’s attorney, Thomas Quartz, offers a counter-narrative. The world hears a version that says Gino had first sought divorce in Michigan, and Jasmine’s alleged avoidance of service forced a pivot—an alternate route in the legal maze. The clash of legal strategies mirrors the show’s own tug-of-war: who’s embracing transparency, who’s embracing the gray area where public life and private life blur into a single, relentless stream of headlines?
US Weekly reached out for comment, seeking the quiet that a public figure craves in moments of personal upheaval. Yet within this press dance, Gino speaks—explicitly, in a tell-all moment—stating his non-paternity of Jasmine’s child. It’s a line that lands with a thud: a reminder that their union, a spiral of commitments, has produced more questions than conventional answers. Their arc—an engagement on 90 Days, a marriage in 2023, and an experiment in ethical non-monogamy—has taken a turn toward the uncharted, with anchors of trust tested by the winds of desire, jealousy, and the ever-present camera lens.
The timeline unfolds with familiar speed: an open-marriage experiment that was intended to broaden horizons ends up testing loyalties, boundaries, and the very definition of commitment. Gino admitted feeling pinned into a choice—one he felt compelled to make because nothing else, he believed, was contributing to their shared happiness. If Jasmine’s happiness was the chess move, then perhaps his own happiness must be the next: a line drawn in the sand that suggested more questions than assurances about a possible reconciliation. 
The dialogue grows more rope-like as the narrative threads weave together. Could they ever find a path back to “us,” given the fractures and the revelations of intimate life aired on screen? Gino’s reflective tone hints at a man who believed he’d navigated a risky compromise for Jasmine’s sake—an attempt to placate, to soothe, to secure a fragile peace. But the peace never fully arrived. The episode’s rhetoric fades into talk of the future—whether the couple might rejoin, whether intimacy could be renegotiated, whether a “third person” could be removed from the equation as if by magic.
Jasmine’s own journey—her relocation to Florida with Matt Branestryanu, her pregnancy, and the birth of a daughter—forms the counterpoint to Gino’s insistence that their bond had always been more complex than the average courtship. The narrative is not a single straight line but a web of relationships: Jasmine’s history with JC and Wans, the other sons in her life, the new life she built with Matt, and the social storytelling that makes every step feel like a chapter of a larger saga. The viewers watch, with a mix of empathy and curiosity, as Jasmine’s story evolves away from the man she once called husband and toward a new definition of family shaped by independence, motherhood, and a relentless public gaze.